image

Malaysia’s DTAs

What is a Double Tax Avoidance Arrangement (DTAA)?

A DTAA is a bilateral treaty that sets out agreed rules on how certain types of income—such as business profits, dividends, royalties, or capital gains—are to be taxed when two jurisdictions could both lay claim.

These treaties, while often modeled on the OECD Model Tax Convention, are not adopted wholesale.

Malaysia has gradually tailored its treaty provisions, at times borrowing language from the United Nations Model Tax Convention to better reflect its domestic tax policies or to accommodate the circumstances of its treaty partners. This means no two DTAAs are identical: each is negotiated to strike a balance between protecting Malaysia’s tax base and encouraging cross-border trade and investment.

Malaysia’s DTAAs come in two main forms:

  • Comprehensive agreements, which cover nearly all categories of income.
  • Limited agreements, which apply only to specific income streams, such as revenue from shipping or air transport.

These treaties are legally binding only once both Malaysia and its partner country complete their internal ratification processes. Typically, this involves legislative approval, the exchange of diplomatic notes, or formal ratification instruments. After entry into force, the treaty’s provisions enter into effect from the dates specified in the agreement.

Countries with signed DTAs with Malaysia

No

Country / Jurisdiction

Status

DTA Signed

1

Albania

In force

24 Jan 1994

2

Australia

In force + Protocols

20 Aug 1980

3

Austria

In force

20 Sep 1989

4

Bahrain

In force + Protocol

14 Jun 1999

5

Bangladesh

In force

19 Apr 1983

6

Belgium

In force + Protocol

24 Oct 1973

7

Bosnia & Herzegovina

In force

21 Jun 2007

8

Brunei

In force

5 Aug 2009

9

Cambodia

In force

3 Sep 2019

10

Canada

In force

16 Oct 1976

11

Chile

In force

3 Sep 2004

12

China

In force + Protocol

23 Nov 1985

13

Croatia

In force

18 Feb 2002

14

Czech Republic

In force

8 Mar 1996

15

Denmark

In force + Protocol

4 Dec 1970

16

Egypt

In force

14 Apr 1997

17

Fiji

In force

19 Dec 1995

18

Finland

In force

28 Mar 1984

19

France

In force + Protocols

24 Apr 1975

20

Germany

In force

23 Feb 2010

21

Hong Kong (China)

In force

25 Apr 2012

22

Hungary

In force

22 May 1989

23

India

In force (latest treaty)

9 May 2012

24

Indonesia

In force + Protocol

12 Sep 1991

25

Iran

In force + Protocol

11 Nov 1992

26

Ireland

In force + Protocol

28 Nov 1998

27

Italy

In force

28 Jan 1984

28

Japan

In force + Protocol

19 Feb 1999

29

Jordan

In force

2 Oct 1994

30

Kazakhstan

In force

26 Jun 2006

31

Korea (Republic)

In force

20 Apr 1982

32

Kuwait

In force

5 Feb 2003

33

Kyrgyz Republic

In force

17 Nov 2000

34

Laos

In force

3 Jun 2010

35

Lebanon

In force

20 Jan 2003

36

Luxembourg

In force

21 Nov 2002

37

Malta

In force

3 Oct 1995

38

Mauritius

In force

23 Aug 1992

39

Mongolia

In force

27 Jul 1995

40

Morocco

In force

2 Jul 2001

41

Myanmar

In force

9 Mar 1998

42

Namibia

In force

28 Jul 1998

43

Netherlands

In force + Protocols

7 Mar 1988

44

New Zealand

In force + Protocols

19 Mar 1976

45

Norway

In force

23 Dec 1970

46

Pakistan

In force

29 May 1982

47

Papua New Guinea

In force

20 May 1993

48

Philippines

In force

27 Apr 1982

49

Poland

In force

8 Jul 2013

50

Qatar

In force + Protocol

3 Jul 2008

51

Romania

In force

26 Nov 1982

52

Russia

In force

31 Jul 1987

53

San Marino

In force

19 Nov 2009

54

Saudi Arabia

In force

31 Jan 2006

55

Seychelles

In force

3 Dec 2003

56

Singapore

In force

5 Oct 2004

57

Slovak Republic

In force

25 May 2015

58

South Africa

In force + Protocol

26 Jul 2005

59

Spain

In force

24 May 2006

60

Sri Lanka

In force

16 Sep 1997

61

Sudan

In force

7 Oct 1993

62

Sweden

In force + Notes of Exchange

12 Mar 2002

63

Switzerland

In force

30 Dec 1974

64

Syrian Arab Republic

In force

26 Feb 2007

65

Thailand

In force + Protocol

29 Mar 1982

66

Türkiye

In force + Protocol

27 Sep 1994

67

Turkmenistan

In force

19 Nov 2008

68

Ukraine

In force

4 Aug 2016

69

United Arab Emirates

In force

28 Nov 1995

70

United Kingdom

In force + Protocols

10 Dec 1996

71

Uzbekistan

In force

6 Oct 1997

72

Venezuela

In force

28 Aug 2006

73

Vietnam

In force

7 Sep 1995

74

Zimbabwe

In force

28 Apr 1994

Benefits of DTAA for investors and multinationals

The core purpose of a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) is to prevent the same income from being taxed twice, which can otherwise make cross-border operations costly and complex. By clearly defining where taxes should be paid and at what rate, DTAAs deliver several strategic benefits:

  • Encourage foreign direct investment by providing clarity and predictability for cross-border operations.
  • Reduce overall tax burdens, including withholding taxes, freeing up capital for reinvestment and expansion.
  • Improve tax certainty and align with international standards, minimizing the risk of disputes and prolonged legal uncertainty.
  • Enable use of domestic incentives such as participation exemptions in combination with treaty benefits.

Malaysia’s DTAA network is extensive and strategically important. The country has signed 73 comprehensive agreements with jurisdictions across Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and the Americas, along with several limited treaties covering specific income types. These agreements govern the taxation of business profits, dividends, interest, royalties, and other income streams, ensuring consistent treatment between partner countries.

Key advantages include lower withholding tax rates—which otherwise stand at 15 percent for interest and 10 percent for royalties—reduced under many treaties to as low as 5 percent. DTAAs also define when a foreign company is considered to have a taxable presence (permanent establishment) in Malaysia and provide mechanisms such as tax credits or exemptions to eliminate double taxation.

Together, these features make DTAAs a powerful tool for improving post-tax returns and strengthening Malaysia’s position as a competitive base for regional headquarters and production hubs.

Aspect

Without DTAA

With DTAA

Withholding Tax on Interest

15%

As low as 5% (depending on treaty)

Withholding Tax on Royalties

10%

As low as 5%

Tax on Dividends

Subject to domestic rules

Often reduced or exempt under treaty provisions

Double taxation risk

High – income taxed in both Malaysia and home country

Eliminated via tax credit or exemption in home country

Permanent establishment rules

Determined solely by domestic law

Clearly defined in treaty, reducing uncertainty

Dispute resolution

Limited options, potential for prolonged litigation

Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) for resolving disputes

Tax certainty

Low – higher compliance risk

High – predictable and transparent tax treatment

Investor appeal

Lower – higher effective tax burden

Higher – improved post-tax returns and planning certainty

How DTAs work in practice for foreign investors

Malaysia offers two primary mechanisms to relieve double taxation:

  • Bilateral Tax Credit: When a DTAA exists between Malaysia and the investor’s home country, the foreign tax paid can be credited against Malaysian tax on the same income. The credit is limited to the lower of the foreign tax paid or the Malaysian tax payable on that income.
  • Unilateral Tax Credit: For jurisdictions without a DTAA, Malaysia still provides relief under domestic law. In such cases, a unilateral credit is granted, typically capped at 50 percent of the foreign tax paid, ensuring some mitigation even in the absence of a treaty

To claim these credits, taxpayers must meet strict compliance standards:

  • Proof of foreign tax paid, such as official tax receipts or assessments from the foreign jurisdiction.
  • Timely filing: Claims must be submitted within two years from the end of the relevant assessment year.
  • Supporting documents: Certificate of residence, income statements, and any documentation requested by the Inland Revenue Board (IRB).

How to apply for DTA benefits in Malaysia

  • Verify that a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) exists between Malaysia and the investor’s home country.
  • Review the treaty provisions to understand applicable withholding tax rates and conditions.
  • Secure an official Certificate of Residence from the home-country tax authority to prove tax residency status.
  • Complete Malaysia’s prescribed DTA application forms (available via the Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia, IRB).
  • Attach the Certificate of Residence and any supporting documents requested by the IRB.
  • Submit the application before the taxable payment is due or within the IRB’s stipulated timeframe.
  • Timely submission ensures the treaty rate applies at source, reducing withholding tax immediately.
  • If forms are late or incomplete, the default domestic withholding tax rate will apply.
  • Retroactive adjustments are generally not guaranteed, so compliance with deadlines is critical.

Mutual Agreement Procedure

When cross-border tax friction arises, Malaysia leans on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) embedded in its double tax agreements to broker practical, negotiated solutions rather than leaving taxpayers trapped between contesting jurisdictions. The Malaysian Inland Revenue Board (IRB or LHDN) treats MAP as a central, taxpayer-facing channel: it accepts MAP requests where a treaty partner’s action (or inaction) produces double taxation or otherwise frustrates the treaty’s intent, and it actively engages the foreign competent authority to seek an agreed outcome.

WATCH

Investing in Malaysia 2025: A Comprehensive Guide to Market Entry, Taxation, and Compliance

Procedurally, MAP in Malaysia is designed to be accessible and to cover the full range of treaty disputes — including transfer-pricing and attribution cases — provided the taxpayer’s case falls within the scope and time limits of the relevant treaty. In practice, that means taxpayers typically invoke MAP after exhausting domestic remedies (or in parallel where treaties allow), and the Malaysian competent authority coordinates with its counterpart(s) to resolve the issue by negotiation, arbitration (where the treaty contains a binding arbitration clause), or by crafting an administrative solution that removes the double charge. The IRB’s MAP Guidelines and recent FAQs clarify filing steps, documentation expectations and that many Malaysia treaties impose a three-year time limit to submit a MAP request unless the treaty specifies otherwise.

MAP is not just for reactive dispute resolution; it is also the natural complement to advance certainty mechanisms — most notably Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs). Malaysia’s MAP framework expressly contemplates that APAs can be negotiated bilaterally or multilaterally through the competent authorities under treaty MAP provisions. In other words, where a multinational group seeks price certainty up front for intercompany transactions touching multiple treaty partners, Malaysia can coordinate with other jurisdictions to deliver matching rulings, reducing the risk of later transfer-pricing adjustments that would trigger MAP disputes.

The IRB replaced prior APA rules with the Income Tax (Advance Pricing Arrangement) Rules 2023 and published updated APA Guidelines in April 2024, tightening process requirements while clarifying timelines, fees and documentation standards for unilateral, bilateral and multilateral APAs.

FAQs: Malaysia's Double Tax Avoidance Arrangement (DTAA)

What types of income are covered by Malaysia’s DTAs?

Malaysia’s DTAs generally cover the full range of cross-border income categories, including business profits, dividends, interest, royalties, technical service fees, and income from employment. They also set out rules on taxing capital gains, shipping and air transport, and in some cases pensions. The precise scope depends on the specific treaty, but the core aim is consistent: to prevent the same income from being taxed twice by both Malaysia and the treaty partner country.

How do I claim foreign tax credit under a Malaysian DTA?

If you are a Malaysian tax resident and have paid tax on foreign-sourced income in a treaty partner country, you may be entitled to a credit against your Malaysian tax liability. To claim this, you must submit proof of foreign tax paid — usually in the form of a certificate or official receipt — when filing your Malaysian tax return. The Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (LHDN) will grant a credit up to the amount of Malaysian tax payable on that income. If the foreign tax exceeds the Malaysian liability, the excess generally cannot be refunded or carried forward.

Does Malaysia tax foreign dividends?

As of January 2022, foreign-sourced income received in Malaysia — including dividends — is taxable unless specifically exempted. However, relief may be available under a DTA if the income has already been taxed abroad. In practice, the availability of an exemption or foreign tax credit depends on both Malaysia’s domestic law at the time and the wording of the relevant treaty. Multinationals often rely on advance guidance or planning to ensure double taxation is avoided.

What if my country doesn’t have a DTA with Malaysia?

In the absence of a DTA, there is no treaty-based mechanism to limit double taxation. This means Malaysian domestic tax rules apply in full, and any relief for foreign taxes paid depends solely on Malaysia’s unilateral provisions. For businesses and individuals in non-treaty jurisdictions, this can result in a heavier overall tax burden. In such cases, proactive tax planning — or structuring cross-border activity through a treaty jurisdiction — is often considered.

How do MLI anti-abuse provisions affect treaty benefits?

Malaysia has adopted the OECD’s Multilateral Instrument (MLI), which overlays many of its existing treaties with anti-abuse measures. Chief among these is the Principal Purpose Test (PPT), which denies treaty benefits if obtaining that benefit was one of the principal purposes of an arrangement or transaction, unless granting the benefit is consistent with the object and purpose of the treaty. In practice, this means taxpayers must be able to demonstrate commercial substance and genuine business rationale for their structures; “treaty shopping” arrangements are unlikely to succeed.

CHANGE SECTION

How can we help?

Hi there!

Let me show you how I can be of assistance.

I can help you find and connect with an advisor, get guidance, search resources, or share feedback about this site.

Please select what you’d like to do:

Typing...
How can we help?

Hi there!

Our contact personel in Italy is:

profile Alberto Vettoretti

Please select what you’d like to do:

Typing...
Let us help you advance in Asia

Typing...
Speak to an expert!

Please share a few details about what guidance you seek. We can have a suitable advisor contact you within one business day.

Security Check
Back to top