How BOI EV 3.5 Shapes the Future of EV Battery Investments in Thailand

Thailand is reshaping its automotive industry for the battery era. The EV 3.5 package reduces purchase taxes, offers consumer rebates, and ties short-term import relief to firm local production commitments. Domestic EV registrations reached about seventy thousand units in 2024, a sharp rise from fewer than ten thousand in 2021, and local factories are now coming online. For investors weighing Southeast Asia, Thailand offers immediate demand plus export access, provided they accept binding build-to-suit obligations and prepare for price competition.

What EV 3.5 really does

EV 3.5 runs from 2024 to 2027. It continues consumer subsidies, cuts the excise rate on eligible battery electric vehicles to 2 percent, and grants reduced import duty on completely built units during 2024 and 2025. For mass market passenger cars priced below THB 2 million, rebates are THB 100,000 in 2024 and THB 75,000 in 2025 when battery capacity is at least 50 kWh. Models with smaller batteries receive proportionately lower support. Cars priced above THB 2 million and up to THB 7 million do not receive a direct rebate but still benefit from the reduced excise rate.

The policy obliges investors who benefit from import relief to commit to local production. From 2026, they must assemble two vehicles in Thailand for every one imported, and by 2027, the ratio rises to three to one. Since mid-2025, the government has allowed exports of locally built EVs to count toward these obligations, giving manufacturers more flexibility to balance domestic sales with shipments to ASEAN and global markets.

Alongside these measures, battery makers are offered direct support through the national competitiveness fund, which requires projects to meet performance thresholds of at least 150 Wh/kg in energy density and 1,000 cycles of durability under standard testing.

Applications remain open until the end of 2027, and each project must secure cabinet approval before grants are disbursed.

Investor privileges under the BOI promotion

BOI promotion strengthens the appeal of EV 3.5 by offering more than just fiscal benefits. Depending on the activity code, corporate income tax holidays can extend up to eight years, with additional years available for projects that meet merit criteria.

These tax measures are complemented by non-tax incentives such as one hundred percent foreign ownership, the ability to acquire land for promoted activities, and streamlined visas and work permits for expatriate staff, all of which ease structural barriers that often slow foreign entrants in Southeast Asia. Access to these privileges comes with clear compliance obligations.

Investors must sign an agreement with the Excise Department, lodge a bank guarantee, obtain Thai Industrial Standards certification, and complete testing at the Automotive and Tire Testing Research and Innovation Center or an equivalent international facility. Meeting these requirements is not optional, as they are tied directly to the release of subsidies and can influence the timing of project launches.

Market outlook and infrastructure growth to 2030

Thailand is the largest EV market in Southeast Asia. Local registrations reached about 70,000 units in 2024 despite a broader slowdown in the auto sector. Forecasts point to growth in 2025 as factories operated by global players such as BYD and Great Wall begin shipping at scale. Government targets remain ambitious, with a goal that 30 percent of production will be zero emission by 2030, equal to more than 700,000 units a year at current volumes.

Charging infrastructure is scaling rapidly to match this demand. As of March 2025, the country had more than 3,700 stations with over 11,600 connectors, including more than 6,000 DC fast chargers. Expansion is spreading beyond Bangkok. Highway corridors such as Bangkok to Rayong and Bangkok to Chiang Mai are being equipped with fast charging, while provincial cities are adding urban charging clusters tied to retail developments. The state-owned utility EGAT is co-investing with private partners to ensure national coverage. By 2030, the target is 12,000 DC fast chargers, with more than 30 percent of them outside Greater Bangkok.

Consumer sentiment supports this rollout. Surveys show that middle-income households in urban centers now view EVs as competitive with conventional cars once subsidies and fuel savings are considered. Fleet adoption is also accelerating, with ride-hailing and delivery companies beginning to electrify at scale.

For investors, this combination of consumer uptake and infrastructure expansion is critical. Even though exports can now count toward obligations, a healthy domestic base improves economies of scale, supports suppliers, and reduces logistics costs. Thailand is signaling that it intends to pair production incentives with demand-side readiness, something that other ASEAN peers have struggled to deliver consistently.

Regional positioning and ASEAN comparisons

Thailand leads Southeast Asia’s EV transition with scale, supplier depth, and policy clarity. In 2024, it registered more than 66,000 battery electric vehicles, far ahead of its neighbors, and reinforced its position as the region’s most mature EV market.

Indonesia presents a different case. It holds more than 55 million metric tons of nickel reserves, the largest in the world, and now accounts for more than half of global supply. This gives it unmatched upstream leverage but also exposes investors to policy volatility and environmental scrutiny, as seen in frequent adjustments to export and refining rules.

Vietnam is the fastest-growing EV market in ASEAN. VinFast recorded a one hundred 79 percent surge in sales in 2024, and EVs now represent about twenty percent of new car sales. Yet less than a quarter of components are sourced locally, showing that the supplier base remains underdeveloped. Investors face high growth but also high execution risk.

Malaysia emphasizes stability and business-friendly measures. Incentives for completely knocked down EV assembly have been extended, and the charging infrastructure is expanding. The domestic market is smaller than Thailand’s, which makes Malaysia attractive for premium or niche strategies rather than large-scale mass-market EV production.

Taken together, Thailand offers the most balanced opportunity. It combines immediate market size, an established industrial base, and export flexibility under EV 3.5. For investors comparing ASEAN options, Thailand provides both scale and predictability, while still allowing regional distribution.

Case examples that show the direction

Global manufacturers are already committing. BYD opened its Rayong plant in 2024 with capacity of one hundred fifty thousand units per year and a mandate to export across ASEAN.

Hyundai received BOI approval for an EV and battery project due to begin production in 2026. In the battery supply chain, Gotion and PTT have begun local module production, and Sunwoda secured approval in March 2025 for more than US$1 billion in cell manufacturing investment. These examples confirm that Thailand is attracting a mix of vehicle producers and component specialists, strengthening the cluster for future entrants.

Risks that boards must price in

The Thai EV market is competitive and dominated by Chinese brands with more than seventy percent share. BYD and Great Wall are leading a price war that has pressured margins across the sector. Companies entering Thailand must plan for aggressive pricing in the early years.

Currency volatility is another risk. The baht has traded between THB 32 and THB 35 per USD in the past year, creating uncertainty for investors who import capital goods or raw materials. Treasury planning should include hedging triggers and downside sensitivity to a weaker baht.

Policy certainty is stronger in Thailand than in many peers but still evolving. Subsidy disbursements are subject to compliance checks and bank guarantees, and changes to import duty windows can shift economics. Investors must monitor adjustments, especially as the government seeks to balance fiscal cost with market growth.

Battery technology adds a further layer of risk. Energy density and cycle life thresholds are explicit for grant eligibility, and chemistry shifts could leave capacity stranded. Investors should build optionality into plant design so that upgrades can be made without losing BOI benefits or failing technical standards.

Labor and power costs must also be considered. Thailand’s daily minimum wage ranges from THB 337 to THB 400 depending on the province. Vietnam’s regional monthly wages range from VND 3,450,000 to VND 4,960,000, while Malaysia’s nationwide floor is MYR 1,700 per month. Power costs in Thailand average around THB 4.0 per kWh (US$0.11), which is higher than subsidized tariffs in Indonesia but broadly competitive within the region.

Cost benchmarks for battery projects

Boards want to see comparative capex efficiency across regions. While exact costs depend on technology and localization, recent industry data gives usable ranges.

Location	Typical Capex per GWh of Cell Capacity	Drivers of Cost Differences
China	US$55–75 million	Mature supplier base, low equipment cost, cheaper utilities
Thailand	US$65–90 million	Higher power tariffs, imported raw materials, and incentives offset
Indonesia	US$70–95 million	Nickel advantage, but higher logistics and infrastructure costs
Vietnam	US$65–85 million	Competitive labor, rising power tariffs, smaller supplier base

Thailand sits above China but broadly in line with Vietnam and Indonesia. BOI tax holidays and duty relief can narrow the effective cost gap, especially for large-scale projects with export allocations.

Building a decision framework

Boards should work through three questions. First, do the company’s products fit the EV 3.5 thresholds on price, battery size, and production obligations? Second, is cell manufacturing part of the strategy, and if so, do the technologies meet the national competitiveness fund criteria and filing deadlines? Third, what entry structure balances control with compliance risk? Greenfield projects maximize control, joint ventures spread risk and help with localization, while contract manufacturing offers a low-commitment entry point.

Financial models should include corporate tax holidays, duty-free imports, and grant support against capital expenditure of roughly one hundred fifty to three hundred million US dollars for a greenfield battery plant. Scenario planning must account for currency risk, price competition, and export allocation.

Converting policy into plant decisions

Thailand’s EV 3.5 framework now gives investors the specificity they need. Subsidies, tax relief, production ratios, and compliance obligations are clearly laid out. Export flexibility adds resilience, and the clustering of global manufacturers strengthens the ecosystem.

The decision for boards is no longer whether Thailand is serious about EVs, but how best to structure entry. Investors must align policy benefits with financial models, build compliance into operations, and keep options open for technology upgrades. Those who act during the EV 3.5 window will lock in incentives that can shape their competitive position for the decade ahead.

• Previous Article Cell and Gene Therapy Manufacturing in Singapore: An Investor’s Operating Thesis
• Next Article Investing in Vietnam’s Textile Recycling Industry: An Investor’s Guide