Other BriefingsUnderstanding Capital Gains Treatment for Share and Asset Transfers in the Philippines
In the Philippines, selling a business through a share transfer and selling it through an asset transfer fall under different tax regimes, each producing materially different exit economics. A foreign shareholder exiting via a share sale is generally subject to 15 percent capital gains tax on net gain. The same business sold through an asset deal may expose the seller to 25 percent corporate income tax plus 12 percent value-added tax, before documentary stamp tax and transfer costs. This structural divergence alone frequently creates a significant valuation gap.
Capital gains filings and transaction clearances are administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue. Capital gains tax on unlisted share transfers and on real property must typically be filed and paid within 30 days of sale, while the documentary stamp tax is due within five days after the month-end. Ownership generally cannot be transferred until these obligations are settled, making tax compliance a prerequisite to closing.
Capital gains mechanics on share transfers
If you sell shares in a private Philippine company, the profit is taxed at 15 percent. That profit is simply the sale price minus what you originally paid. If the shares are publicly listed, capital gains tax does not apply. Instead, a stock transaction tax is charged. In both cases, the documentary stamp tax is still payable.
You usually cannot complete the share transfer until both the capital gains tax and documentary stamp tax have been paid. In practice, delays often come from disagreements over valuation or from missing paperwork showing the original purchase price. Transactions also slow down when shares are held through offshore companies, because ownership history is harder to verify.
Losses from other investments generally cannot be used to reduce tax on a profitable share sale. For investors exiting in stages, this means each transaction is taxed on its own, rather than being grouped together.
Asset transfers and their incremental tax layers
Asset sales are governed by a separate tax framework that introduces additional cost variables.
Real property classified as a capital asset is subject to a 6 percent capital gains tax, calculated on the higher selling price, government zonal value, or declared fair market value. This rule routinely produces tax assessments above negotiated transaction prices, particularly in urban and high-growth areas.
Operating assets are treated as ordinary income and taxed at the standard corporate income tax rate of 25 percent. While Philippine law provides a reduced 20 percent rate for small domestic corporations meeting strict revenue and asset thresholds, foreign-owned entities typically do not qualify.
Most asset transfers also trigger 12 percent VAT, calculated on gross selling price rather than profit. Even low-margin exits carry substantial VAT exposure.
Documentary stamp tax applies depending on asset type, including land, receivables, and contractual rights.
Beyond taxation, asset deals require land title re-registration, assignment of commercial contracts, transfer of regulatory licenses, and employee migration. Each requirement introduces additional agencies, documentation cycles, and counterparties, extending timelines and increasing execution risk.
Financial and risk allocation differences between structures
With a share sale, the tax bill sits mainly with the shareholder, through capital gains tax and documentary stamp tax. With an asset sale, the tax burden moves into the company itself, through corporate income tax and VAT, with documentary stamp tax added on top. This difference is a big reason why sellers usually prefer share deals, while buyers often push for asset deals.
Responsibility for past problems also changes. When buyers purchase shares, they take over the company along with its history. When they buy assets, they can choose which liabilities come with the deal and leave the rest behind.
The closing process is different, too. Share transfers mainly depend on paying the taxes and completing registration. Asset transfers usually involve several government agencies and multiple registrations, which often makes them slower to complete.
These differences feed directly into price. In asset deals, sellers often have to absorb corporate income tax and VAT, and this is commonly reflected as a lower headline valuation.
When tax exposure cannot be fully resolved upfront, buyers and sellers usually deal with it through escrow accounts or indemnity clauses. This does not remove the risk — it simply reallocates it between the parties.
Offshore holding structures and indirect transfers
Selling an offshore parent entity does not automatically eliminate Philippine capital gains exposure. Where transaction value is derived substantially from Philippine subsidiaries or real property, local taxing rights may still apply. This issue is central for private equity and regional holding structures that exit above the operating company level.
Treaty relief and substance constraints
Certain tax treaties may reduce capital gains exposure, but relief depends on demonstrable beneficial ownership, economic substance, and contemporaneous documentation. Treaty positioning must exist before signing. Relief cannot be retrofitted once commercial terms are agreed.
Execution risks specific to Philippine transfers
Zonal value disputes regularly inflate real property tax bases. Incomplete acquisition records delay clearance. Asset misclassification creates unexpected VAT exposure.
Tax authority processing timelines frequently exceed initial projections. Buyer and seller tax assumptions often diverge until late-stage negotiations, compressing deal schedules.
Each of these variables materially affects feasibility.
Pre-negotiation preparation
Foreign investors benefit from modeling both share and asset exits before entering negotiations, validating asset classification, organizing acquisition documentation, and aligning tax assumptions with counterparties before issuing term sheets. These steps reduce later clearance delays and preserve pricing leverage.
Entry structure as an exit variable
Ownership configuration, asset composition, and documentation discipline established at market entry often determine whether future exits are constrained by tax leakage and regulatory delay or proceed within predictable parameters. Capital gains exposure forms part of initial structuring, not merely divestment planning.
Moving forward with the Philippine transaction planning
In practice, Philippine exits hinge on three pre-signing confirmations: whether the zonal value will override the contract price on property, whether acquisition cost can be substantiated for share sales, and whether VAT applies to transferred assets. Failure on any of these points usually converts directly into valuation discounts or escrow holdbacks.
About Us
ASEAN Briefing is one of five regional publications under the Asia Briefing brand. It is supported by Dezan Shira & Associates, a pan-Asia, multi-disciplinary professional services firm that assists foreign investors throughout Asia, including through offices in Jakarta, Indonesia; Singapore; Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Da Nang in Vietnam; and Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia. Dezan Shira & Associates also maintains offices or has alliance partners assisting foreign investors in China, Hong Kong SAR, Mongolia, Dubai (UAE), Japan, South Korea, Nepal, The Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Italy, Germany, Bangladesh, Australia, United States, and United Kingdom and Ireland.
For a complimentary subscription to ASEAN Briefing’s content products, please click here. For support with establishing a business in ASEAN or for assistance in analyzing and entering markets, please contact the firm at asean@dezshira.com or visit our website at www.dezshira.com.
