Transfer Pricing in Cambodia: What Foreign Investors Need to Get Right Before Revenue Scales

Transfer pricing becomes relevant in Cambodia once a foreign owned business begins to generate meaningful revenue or move money within its group. At that point, tax authorities assess whether reported profits reflect the activities carried out locally rather than internal descriptions.

Related Reading

Understanding Minimum Capital Requirements for Foreign-Owned Companies in Cambodia

For investors, the focus is on whether the operating model, pricing approach, and cash flows remain aligned as the business grows, since misalignment quickly constrains expansion, repatriation, and audit outcomes.

How related party pricing is assessed in practice

Cambodia’s tax authority looks at how a business operates on the ground. They focus on who does the work in Cambodia, where the costs sit, who makes day-to-day decisions, and how responsibility is shared within the group. Pricing that matches this reality is more likely to be accepted than pricing that relies only on contracts or internal policies.

Find Business Support

Speak with Dezan Shira & Associates about transfer pricing in Cambodia

What matters most is consistency. Pricing that stays stable and makes commercial sense as the business grows draws less attention than pricing that changes without a clear operational reason. For investors, pricing needs to reflect how the business really runs, not just how it is described on paper.

Where transfer pricing exposure commonly arises

Transfer pricing exposure in Cambodia is concentrated in routine group transactions that directly affect where profit is recorded. Service fees, management charges, royalties, intercompany financing, and cross-border sourcing shape local profitability even when the business structure appears straightforward.

Because these transactions recur, small pricing misalignments compound over time and become visible once operations scale.

When transfer pricing becomes a problem

Transfer pricing problems almost never show up when a company is first set up. They usually appear later, once the business is running steadily and results start to repeat. Ongoing losses, profit levels that look out of step with similar local businesses, or the first attempts to move money out of Cambodia are often when questions begin.

By the time this happens, the way the business is structured and priced is already fixed. Any changes made after that are about fixing problems rather than shaping strategy, and they become more expensive as the room to adjust narrows.

What documentation is expected to show

Documentation is assessed based on whether it explains why pricing outcomes make sense given the company’s role within the group. Effective documentation shows how prices were determined, how they reflect actual operations, and why they remain appropriate as the business evolves.

Documentation prepared only after concerns are raised may satisfy a formal request but rarely resolves the underlying issue. Once inconsistencies are visible, documentation alone cannot restore alignment.

Why regional pricing policies often break down

Foreign investors frequently apply regional or global transfer pricing policies to Cambodia without modification. These policies are often designed around different cost structures, decision making environments, or risk assumptions.

When Cambodia’s actual operating role does not match the assumptions embedded in group policies, pricing outcomes become difficult to sustain. This mismatch is a common source of transfer pricing disputes for ASEAN based groups and reflects a broader regional enforcement direction rather than a local anomaly.

How transfer pricing issues surface during audits

Transfer pricing concerns usually arise during broader tax audits rather than standalone reviews. Once identified, they tend to extend audit timelines, increase information requests, and shift discussions toward profit allocation.

The commercial impact goes beyond potential tax adjustments. Management attention is diverted, decision making slows, and future transactions receive closer scrutiny. For investors, this operational drag often outweighs the financial exposure itself.

Operating model decisions that shape pricing outcomes

The most important transfer pricing outcomes are determined by how Cambodia is positioned within the group. Whether the entity operates as a routine platform, a service provider, or a more substantive business directly influences what profit levels are considered reasonable.

This positioning is reflected in staffing, authority, and responsibility rather than formal labels. Once established, it sets the ceiling for pricing outcomes and limits later adjustment options.

The connection between pricing and cash movement

Transfer pricing and profit repatriation are closely linked. When reported profits do not support outbound payments, pricing assumptions are quickly reexamined. Inconsistencies between cash flows and taxable income are among the fastest ways to attract attention.

Find Business Support

Contact Dezan Shira & Associates for practical guidance on Cambodia transfer pricing

For investors planning early or regular repatriation, pricing alignment is essential. Cash movement must be supported by profit outcomes that accurately reflect the economic role of the Cambodian entity.

What investors should resolve before scaling

Before revenue accelerates, investors should be confident that pricing reflects actual functions, margins are commercially sustainable, and internal processes support consistent execution. This stage represents the last opportunity to correct misalignment without material cost or disruption.

Once the scale is reached, transfer pricing stops being a planning decision and becomes a constraint that must be managed rather than avoided.

• Previous Article VAT Registration, E-Faktur, and Ongoing Compliance in Indonesia for Foreign Investors
• Next Article