Other BriefingsTax Dispute Resolution: Objections and Appeals for Foreign Investors in Indonesia
Foreign investors operating in Indonesia are subject to tax assessments that may not always align with commercial realities, particularly in regulated sectors such as mining, manufacturing, and digital services. When a tax assessment is materially inaccurate, the objection and appeals framework provides formal avenues to correct errors and assert taxpayer rights.
Effective use of these mechanisms requires mastery of procedural requirements, evidence standards, and strategic risk evaluation.
Grounds for contesting tax assessments
Taxpayers may file objections against formal tax assessments or withholding tax decisions issued by the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT), including underpayment determinations or audit adjustments. Objections must be submitted within three months of the assessment date and must be accompanied by detailed explanations supported by documentation that demonstrates factual or legal inconsistencies. The burden of proof lies entirely with the taxpayer, who must clearly substantiate the correctness of reported transactions or positions.
Structured objection process and evidence demands
The entire objection must be complete at submission and delivered to the tax office that issued the assessment. Evidence should include audited financial statements, contracts, invoices, bank records, and transfer pricing documentation where applicable. Consistency across tax filings, financial reports, and supporting documentation is critical to credibility. The DGT reviews objections independently of the initial audit team and must issue a decision within 12 months. Silence is treated as rejection by default.
Filing an objection does not suspend payment obligations. Taxpayers must pay at least 50 percent of the disputed amount or provide a security deposit to avoid interest penalties. This requirement underscores the importance of liquidity planning for companies considering disputes, particularly in high-value assessments.
Case illustration: Transfer pricing adjustment
A multinational manufacturer operating in Indonesia was assessed for 35 billion rupiah in underpaid corporate tax due to alleged transfer pricing distortions related to transactions with its Singapore affiliate. Despite maintaining OECD-aligned documentation, the tax authority applied local comparables and recalculated profit margins. The company filed an objection supported by independent benchmarking studies and reconciled financials proving compliance. The objection was partially granted, reducing the dispute by 60 percent before further escalation through appeal.
Escalating to a tax court appeal
If an objection is fully or partially rejected, the taxpayer may escalate the matter to the Tax Court within three months. Appeals permit an independent legal review of the case, incorporating evidence and legal arguments, including cross-border tax considerations such as double tax treaty application, transfer pricing compliance, and permanent establishment challenges. The appeal process is formal, adversarial, and typically spans 18–24 months.
The disputed tax must be paid or guaranteed before appeal, requiring a strategic assessment of cash flow and long-term litigation risks.
Emerging risks and strategic tax governance
Tax scrutiny in Indonesia is intensifying for digital service providers, carbon-intensive industries, and companies claiming special incentives. The shift toward ESG-driven policies and Value-Added Tax (VAT) on digital goods and services increases audit likelihood for firms with cross-border revenue streams. International tax transparency standards, such as the OECD Pillar 2 minimum tax and automatic exchange of information, also expose foreign investors to heightened compliance expectations.
Compliance strategy for foreign investors
International businesses should embed dispute prevention into tax governance frameworks through consistent documentation, proactive engagement with auditors, and internal controls aligned with Indonesia’s evidentiary expectations.
Structured internal review processes, supported by professional advisory guidance, help mitigate risks and position the company favorably in case of audit or dispute.
About Us
ASEAN Briefing is one of five regional publications under the Asia Briefing brand. It is supported by Dezan Shira & Associates, a pan-Asia, multi-disciplinary professional services firm that assists foreign investors throughout Asia, including through offices in Jakarta, Indonesia; Singapore; Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Da Nang in Vietnam; and Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia. Dezan Shira & Associates also maintains offices or has alliance partners assisting foreign investors in China, Hong Kong SAR, Mongolia, Dubai (UAE), Japan, South Korea, Nepal, The Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Italy, Germany, Bangladesh, Australia, United States, and United Kingdom and Ireland.
For a complimentary subscription to ASEAN Briefing’s content products, please click here. For support with establishing a business in ASEAN or for assistance in analyzing and entering markets, please contact the firm at asean@dezshira.com or visit our website at www.dezshira.com.
