Other BriefingsShould Foreign Companies in Indonesia Appoint Local Directors for Governance or Compliance Only?
Foreign companies entering Indonesia often appoint a local director early, usually to satisfy licensing, banking, or operational requirements. While the appointment may appear administrative, it shapes where authority is exercised, how regulators and banks engage with the company, and who carries personal and corporate risk when problems arise.
The real decision is not whether a local director is required, but whether that role should remain limited to compliance or extend into governance as the business operates and grows.
Why local directors are appointed in practice
Indonesian company law allows directors of any nationality.
Practical operating conditions frequently push foreign companies toward appointing a locally based director. OSS-RBA licensing processes, engagement with sectoral regulators, employment administration, and daily interactions with Indonesian banks all tend to function more smoothly when decision-makers are physically present in the country.
Compared with some other ASEAN markets where offshore control structures remain workable for longer, Indonesia places earlier practical pressure on having accountable authority onshore.
The structural choice that foreign investors must make
Foreign companies generally adopt one of two structures. A compliance-only local director is appointed to satisfy regulatory or administrative expectations while strategic and commercial authority remains offshore. A governance-level local director holds real decision-making power and represents the company in operational, regulatory, and financial matters.
This choice determines how quickly decisions can be executed, how responsibility is allocated, and how external parties assess the company’s seriousness and accountability.
When a compliance-only structure remains defensible
A compliance-only structure can be appropriate when Indonesian activities are narrow and tightly controlled. This is typically the case for holding entities, early-stage market entry vehicles, or companies without employees, regulated activities, or recurring local contracts.
In these circumstances, offshore decision-making remains practical because execution does not depend on daily onshore judgment.
The operational triggers that change the decision
As operations grow, the limits of a compliance-only structure start to show. Hiring employees brings day-to-day decisions that cannot always wait for offshore approval. Regular customer contracts expose delays when the signing authority is unclear. Regulated activities increase contact with local regulators, while banking relationships demand faster responses on routine matters.
When these pressures combine, authority that exists only on paper quickly falls out of step with how the business runs.
The banking reality that most foreign investors underestimate
Indonesian banks frequently accelerate the governance decision. Even where corporate documents allow offshore signatories, banks often expect resident directors to manage account openings, compliance queries, urgent transactions, and ongoing relationship management.
When authority is split between offshore directors and a nominal local appointee, execution slows and operational risk increases. For many CFOs, banking friction becomes the first clear signal that a compliance-only structure is no longer workable.
How risk and liability are allocated in practice
Director appointments allocate responsibility as much as authority, and that allocation is shaped less by internal descriptions than by how the company operates in real situations.
Local directors can face exposure during tax audits, labor inspections, or regulatory inquiries even when their formal mandate is narrow, while offshore directors may remain exposed where they retain effective control without being physically present to supervise execution.
In Indonesia, regulators and counterparties tend to assess responsibility based on conduct, reliance, and accessibility rather than on internal labels or governance charts.
How control is maintained
In practice, control is determined by internal architecture rather than nationality.
Shareholder reserved matters, approval thresholds, signing authorities, and banking mandates collectively define how decisions are made and executed, and when these mechanisms are clear and consistently applied, a governance-level local director can operate with meaningful authority while preserving shareholder oversight.
By contrast, a compliance-only structure that lacks disciplined internal controls offers little real protection once operational pressure increases.
Recognizing misalignment before it becomes a dispute
Misalignment rarely appears as a single failure and is more often revealed through a series of small accommodations.
A local director begins handling bank correspondence because offshore approvals take too long, regulators engage directly with the local director because they are the only accessible decision-maker, and contracts stall while authority is clarified.
In a common scenario, a foreign-owned trading company loses a customer after weeks of delay because contract amendments require offshore signatures that cannot be coordinated in time, signaling that the director structure has already drifted out of sync with operational reality.
A practical decision test for boards
If a company employs staff in Indonesia, signs contracts locally, engages regulators beyond routine filings, or relies on Indonesian banks for daily operations, compliance-only authority is unlikely to remain defensible. Where operational decisions routinely require onshore judgment, governance authority should sit onshore. Where none of these conditions apply, a compliance-only structure may still be appropriate.
Aligning the director structure with the Indonesia strategy
Local director appointments should reflect how the business operates today and how it intends to scale. Where authority and operational reality diverge, governance risk exists regardless of formal documentation. Foreign companies that align director roles with their Indonesia strategy improve execution, reduce regulatory friction, and protect shareholder interests as complexity increases.
About Us
ASEAN Briefing is one of five regional publications under the Asia Briefing brand. It is supported by Dezan Shira & Associates, a pan-Asia, multi-disciplinary professional services firm that assists foreign investors throughout Asia, including through offices in Jakarta, Indonesia; Singapore; Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Da Nang in Vietnam; and Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia. Dezan Shira & Associates also maintains offices or has alliance partners assisting foreign investors in China, Hong Kong SAR, Mongolia, Dubai (UAE), Japan, South Korea, Nepal, The Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Italy, Germany, Bangladesh, Australia, United States, and United Kingdom and Ireland.
For a complimentary subscription to ASEAN Briefing’s content products, please click here. For support with establishing a business in ASEAN or for assistance in analyzing and entering markets, please contact the firm at asean@dezshira.com or visit our website at www.dezshira.com.
- Previous Article An Introduction to Doing Business in ASEAN 2026 – New Publication from Dezan Shira & Associates
- Next Article
