Profit Repatriation in Vietnam: Key Strategies for Investors

Vietnam has become one of Southeast Asia’s most attractive destinations for foreign investment, drawing multinational companies into manufacturing, services, and technology. As operations mature, the ability to transfer profits abroad becomes a central part of financial strategy. Repatriation is permitted, but it is subject to rules that tie transfers to audited results, tax compliance, and banking oversight.

In 2025, the regulatory environment is shifting. A new corporate income tax law changes how cross-border income is recognized, the global minimum tax alters the effectiveness of traditional incentives, and banking requirements are being standardized.

For foreign investors, profit repatriation is no longer a routine administrative step but a decision that directly influences liquidity, tax efficiency, and shareholder returns.

Eligibility and timing

Vietnam permits profit repatriation once per year, after audited financial statements are completed and all corporate obligations have been settled. These requirements are set out in Ministry of Finance Circular 186/2010, which also requires a notification to the tax office at least seven working days before any transfer.

Companies that report accumulated losses or still owe taxes cannot remit profits until these issues are cleared.

As a result, the annual audit cycle, which typically concludes in the first quarter, becomes the anchor point for repatriation planning.

Banking channels

All transfers must move through a Direct Investment Capital Account with a licensed bank. This rule, established by State Bank of Vietnam Circular 06/2019, ensures that both inflows and outflows are properly tracked. A 2025 update, Circular 03/2025, introduced standardized purpose codes and documentation requirements, creating greater consistency across banks.

Banks act as gatekeepers, verifying audited results, tax clearance, and shareholder resolutions before processing transfers. Once these requirements are met and the notice period has expired, remittances are typically executed within one week.

Tax treatment of profit repatriation

The value that ultimately reaches investors depends on the channel used.

Channel	Tax Treatment 2025	Notes
Dividends to corporate shareholders	0% withholding	Most efficient for parent companies
Dividends to individual shareholders	5% personal income tax	Applied at source
Royalties	10% withholding	Treated as foreign contractor income
Service fees	5% corporate income tax + VAT (rate varies by service)	Requires compliance with Decree 132 transfer pricing rules
Interest payments	5% withholding, proposed to rise to 10% from Oct 2025	Applies to shareholder and third-party loans

Vietnam does not impose a separate branch remittance tax. Branches are taxed under the general corporate income tax regime, which avoids an additional layer of withholding.

Treaty relief

Vietnam has signed more than eighty double taxation agreements. These treaties can reduce or eliminate withholding taxes, but relief is available only if a valid certificate of residence is provided by the foreign recipient’s home jurisdiction. Without this certificate, banks and tax authorities apply domestic rates by default.

2025 developments

From October 2025, amendments to the corporate income tax law will require Vietnamese taxpayers to recognize profits from overseas investments in the year they are earned, rather than when remitted. This change affects holding structures and cross-border group planning, but it does not alter the annual repatriation window for foreign-invested enterprises.

The global minimum tax of fifteen percent, now applicable to large multinational groups, reduces the effectiveness of older tax holidays. In response, Vietnam is considering subsidies for strategic industries to maintain competitiveness.

Banking reforms under Circular 03/2025 also standardize remittance documentation. While this increases compliance requirements, it makes the process more predictable across banks.

Plans for international financial centers in Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang reflect the government’s long-term ambition to liberalize capital flows. These initiatives are at the policy and project stage, and they do not yet change the rules for profit repatriation.

Regional comparison

When benchmarked against ASEAN peers, Vietnam offers favorable tax outcomes but with tighter procedural control.

Country	Dividend Withholding for Corporations	FX Controls
Vietnam	0%	Annual audit-based window
Singapore	0%	None, fully liberalized
Indonesia	20% (reducible by treaty)	Tax clearance required
Thailand	10%	Moderate oversight

 

Vietnam is advantageous in dividend withholding compared to Indonesia and Thailand, but less flexible in timing than Singapore.

Strategic choices for investors

The optimal channel for profit repatriation depends on the structure of the business, the type of shareholder, and the company’s cash flow needs. A manufacturing subsidiary with stable profits is often best served by annual dividends to its corporate parent, since these payments are not subject to withholding tax. Where the shareholder is an individual, however, a five percent personal income tax applies at source, which reduces the net return.

Service-based subsidiaries sometimes prefer to invoice their parent companies for management or technical support. These payments are taxed at a deemed five percent corporate income tax rate together with value-added tax, but they allow more frequent transfers than once-a-year dividends. Vietnam’s treaties can reduce the income-tax element of service fees when the foreign parent does not have a permanent establishment in Vietnam and provides a certificate of residence. Even in these cases, value-added tax continues to apply, as treaties cover income tax but not indirect taxes.

Some foreign investors finance their subsidiaries with shareholder loans and remit profits in the form of interest. At present, interest payments attract a five percent withholding tax. From October 2025, this is proposed to increase to ten percent, which will significantly change the cost profile of loan-based repatriation and may make dividends more efficient.

Repatriation is not the only choice. Companies planning to expand may prefer to reinvest profits in Vietnam, which can generate higher returns and, when applied to qualifying new or expansion projects, may allow access to preferential tax treatment. This is not automatic for retained earnings but depends on meeting Vietnam’s incentive criteria for targeted sectors or regions.

In practice, many businesses use a hybrid approach, combining annual dividends with service fees or modest shareholder loans. This mix balances the efficiency of dividends with the liquidity flexibility of other channels, while allowing investors to optimize outcomes under both domestic rules and available treaty relief.

Case scenarios

A foreign-owned factory with annual profits of US$10 million can remit the full amount to its corporate parent without any withholding. If the shareholder were an individual, five percent would be deducted, leaving US$9.5 million.

A consulting subsidiary invoicing its parent for management services every quarter can move cash more frequently, but each transfer is reduced by five percent tax plus value-added tax. Over the course of a year, this significantly increases the cost compared with annual dividends.

A subsidiary financed by shareholder loans currently pays five percent withholding on interest. With US$5 million in annual interest payments, this costs US$250,000. If the proposed increase to ten percent from October 2025 is implemented, the tax cost will double to US$500,000, making dividends more attractive.

A services company with a parent in Singapore highlights the importance of treaties. With a certificate of residence, the five percent tax on service fees can be eliminated under the bilateral agreement. Without treaty access, the full tax applies, reducing cash available offshore.

Outlook

Vietnam’s long-term trajectory points toward greater integration with international markets. The development of financial centers in Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang shows a commitment to building infrastructure for freer capital movement, but these remain future-oriented projects. For now, the framework remains conservative yet predictable. Investors who align their compliance calendar with the audit cycle and select the most efficient repatriation channel will continue to achieve stable outcomes.

• Previous Article 印度尼西亚市场中的代理、分销与特许经营：如何拟定制胜合同条款
• Next Article Franchising in the Philippines for Foreign Investors