Managing Group Reporting and Consolidation from Vietnam

Vietnam’s growing role in group accounting and financial reporting requires early structural attention. Sustained economic expansion and strong manufacturing-led foreign investment have accelerated the point at which Vietnamese entities materially affect consolidated financial statements. In 2024, foreign direct investment disbursement reached approximately US$25.35 billion, underscoring the scale and permanence of foreign-owned operations in the country.

Related Reading

Understanding Vietnam Accounting Standards (VAS) for Foreign Companies

Once Vietnam becomes financially material, weaknesses in accounting alignment and reporting design no longer remain local. They surface at the group level through earnings volatility, delayed closes, and audit pressure. The decision is whether Vietnam is designed into the group reporting architecture early or allowed to mature into a structural risk that must be corrected later.

Accounting alignment determines earnings reliability

Vietnam’s local financial statements are prepared using Vietnamese rules, which are not the same as the rules many multinational groups use. The key decision is whether these differences are fixed early or allowed to continue every reporting period. When differences are left unresolved, they build up over time and make group results harder to trust and explain. Addressing alignment early keeps group numbers clear and consistent. Waiting too long makes reporting more complicated and harder to clean up as the business grows.

Ledger architecture drives consolidation friction

Even where accounting policies are aligned, consolidation outcomes are shaped by ledger architecture. Ledgers designed primarily for local statutory reporting often require repeated reclassification during consolidation. The decision is whether consolidation friction is treated as an operational inconvenience or recognized as a structural design issue.

Find Business Support

Speak with Dezan Shira & Associates to assess how Vietnam fits into your group reporting structure.

Once transaction volumes increase and historical data accumulates, remediation shifts from adjustment to restructuring, increasing cost, disruption, and resistance to change.

Reporting timelines shape management visibility

Local statutory reporting processes do not always align with group reporting cycles. The decision is whether the group accepts provisional consolidation based on estimates or enforces tighter local close discipline. Persistent reporting lag reduces confidence in consolidated results and limits management’s ability to respond to emerging financial or operational risks.

Over time, delayed visibility becomes a governance issue rather than a timing issue.

Foreign exchange exposure becomes a board issue at scale

Currency translation affects consolidated results once Vietnam becomes financially material. The decision is whether the foreign exchange impact is governed explicitly through defined translation policies and disclosure practices or absorbed implicitly into reported earnings.

The unstructured treatment of currency effects complicates performance assessment and undermines the credibility of financial narratives presented to boards and external stakeholders.

Intercompany structures define reconciliation risk

Vietnam operations are often embedded in regional and global supply chains. In 2024, the foreign-invested sector accounted for approximately 71.7 percent of Vietnam’s total export value, reflecting the scale of cross-border activity associated with foreign ownership.

Intercompany arrangements underpinning these flows are frequently designed for operational execution rather than consolidation clarity. The decision is whether intercompany structures preserve traceability at the group level or fragment financial visibility across entities.

Audit outcomes reflect consolidation design choices

Local statutory audits in Vietnam do not automatically satisfy group audit requirements. The decision is whether Vietnam is positioned as a low-risk consolidation component through deliberate reporting design or allowed to become an assurance bottleneck. Audit pressure at the group level typically reflects earlier design choices embedded in accounting alignment, documentation quality, and consolidation processes rather than isolated local execution issues.

Governance determines where financial judgment resides

As Vietnam entities grow in complexity and scale, accounting judgments increasingly influence group-level outcomes. The decision is whether judgment authority is clearly governed at the group or regional level or left diffuse across local teams.

Find Business Support

Contact Dezan Shira & Associates for guidance on designing consolidation and reporting frameworks for Vietnam operations

Weak governance increases post-close corrections and reduces confidence in consolidated results. Clear ownership of judgment preserves consistency as reporting complexity increases.

When Vietnam becomes a structural finance decision

Vietnam becomes a structural finance consideration once it is material to group financial statements, external financing, or valuation analysis. At that point, consolidation outcomes are shaped by earlier design decisions embedded in accounting alignment, reporting architecture, intercompany design, governance, and systems rather than by incremental local adjustments.

Vietnam functions as a consolidation design decision rather than a compliance jurisdiction. Choices made early determine whether growth translates into clear reporting or recurring friction once the scale is reached.

• Previous Article Malaysia Revises Its Expatriate Employment Policy
• Next Article