Other BriefingsInside the Philippines–U.S. Trade Deal: Zero Tariffs for America, 19% for Manila
On July 22, 2025, the Philippines and the United States concluded a bilateral trade agreement that immediately drew international attention and domestic scrutiny. Announced after a high-profile meeting between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House, the deal eliminates tariffs on U.S. exports to the Philippines while preserving a 19 percent tariff on Philippine goods entering the U.S. market.
Though both leaders framed the outcome as a diplomatic success, the details suggest an uneven bargain that reflects broader geopolitical and economic considerations.
Trade terms reflect strategic concessions
The deal’s most controversial feature is its asymmetry. Under the agreement, U.S. exports — including automobiles, soybeans, wheat, and pharmaceuticals — will enter the Philippine market tariff-free. In contrast, Philippine exports to the U.S. will continue to face a 19 percent tariff, slightly reduced from the previously threatened 20 percent.
The Marcos administration emphasized that the agreement forestalled more punitive tariff actions from Washington, framing it as a necessary compromise to maintain access to a critical export market. For the U.S., the deal represents a victory in its broader effort to correct trade imbalances with Asian economies. It also positions the Philippines as one of the first in the region to formally accept a new set of trade conditions shaped by Trump’s 2025 tariff campaign.
Geopolitical alignment underscores the deal
Beyond economics, the agreement serves strategic ends. The Philippines is a longstanding U.S. ally in the Indo-Pacific, and the deal was announced alongside new pledges to deepen military cooperation. For Washington, strengthening ties with Manila supports its broader regional posture amid escalating tensions with China.
Trump publicly praised Marcos as a “tough negotiator” but stressed that the U.S. had secured long-overdue market access. While the specifics of tariff removal on U.S. goods remain vague, both sides celebrated the outcome as a recalibration of a historically lopsided relationship.
Unequal gains for key sectors
Trade data contextualizes the imbalance. In 2024, the Philippines exported US$14.1 billion worth of goods to the U.S., contributing to a nearly US$5 billion trade deficit for Washington. The continuation of a high tariff on these exports will disproportionately affect Philippine sectors such as electronics, textiles, and food processing, where profit margins are already tight.
Conversely, U.S. producers stand to benefit from immediate cost advantages in a Philippine market of over 110 million consumers.
High-value exports like medical products, agricultural commodities, and vehicles may quickly gain market share, especially if local competitors cannot match the price shifts driven by tariff removal.
Domestic backlash and business uncertainty
In Manila, the agreement has triggered concern among lawmakers and industry leaders. While avoiding a harsher 20 percent tariff was viewed as a relief, critics argue that locking in a 19 percent rate is hardly a win. The deal lacks implementation guidelines, sectoral breakdowns, or mechanisms for ongoing review, leaving businesses uncertain about compliance requirements or timelines.
Marcos has attempted to shape the narrative as one of pragmatic diplomacy, but domestic stakeholders continue to call for clearer commitments and regulatory follow-through. Many are still waiting for information on how customs procedures, product standards, and licensing rules will adapt under the new terms.
Regional implications and future dealings
This agreement is part of a broader shift in U.S. trade policy in Asia. It follows recent bilateral arrangements with Indonesia and coincides with negotiations involving Japan, Thailand, and Vietnam. Washington’s use of tariff threats to induce bilateral deals signals a new normal for regional economies reliant on U.S. markets.
For the Philippines, being early to sign may secure political favor and short-term stability, but it also risks setting a precedent that other ASEAN members may avoid. Without reciprocal market access or enforceable concessions, Manila’s negotiating position may weaken in future regional or multilateral talks.
Policy recommendations for a balanced outcome
To address lingering uncertainty, Philippine policymakers should prioritize transparency. Publishing clear sector-by-sector tariff schedules and customs guidance would help exporters and importers adjust supply chains effectively. This includes clarifying whether the 19 percent tariff is flat or subject to product-level differentiation.
In addition, the two governments should consider establishing a bilateral review mechanism. This would allow for structured reassessment of tariff terms after a fixed period, offering a pathway toward greater equity and helping prevent stagnation in trade relations.
Without such tools, the current agreement risks remaining a symbolic gesture rather than a substantive economic partnership.
Strategic win or economic compromise?
The Philippines–United States trade deal offers a snapshot of how diplomacy, trade, and security intersect in today’s Indo-Pacific landscape. While it avoids confrontation and secures continued access to U.S. markets, it does so by accepting conditions that favor American exports without comparable relief for Philippine industry. Whether this will lead to deeper integration or long-term dependency depends on how both sides operationalize the agreement in the months ahead.
About Us
ASEAN Briefing is one of five regional publications under the Asia Briefing brand. It is supported by Dezan Shira & Associates, a pan-Asia, multi-disciplinary professional services firm that assists foreign investors throughout Asia, including through offices in Jakarta, Indonesia; Singapore; Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Da Nang in Vietnam; and Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia. Dezan Shira & Associates also maintains offices or has alliance partners assisting foreign investors in China, Hong Kong SAR, Mongolia, Dubai (UAE), Japan, South Korea, Nepal, The Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Italy, Germany, Bangladesh, Australia, United States, and United Kingdom and Ireland.
For a complimentary subscription to ASEAN Briefing’s content products, please click here. For support with establishing a business in ASEAN or for assistance in analyzing and entering markets, please contact the firm at asean@dezshira.com or visit our website at www.dezshira.com.
