How Branch Profit Remittance Tax Applies to Foreign Entities in Vietnam

Foreign investors operating in Vietnam through branch structures often assume that profit repatriation follows the same tax logic applied elsewhere in the region. In many jurisdictions, branch profits are subject to a second layer of tax when they are remitted to the foreign head office.

Related Reading

LLC or JSC? Deciding the Best Upgrade from a Vietnam RO

Vietnam’s approach is materially different. While the term “branch profit remittance tax” is commonly used as a regional shorthand, the country does not impose a separate tax triggered solely by the act of remitting branch profits.

Vietnam’s policy treatment of branch profits

Vietnam integrates branch taxation into its general corporate income tax framework. Profits generated by a foreign branch are taxed at the corporate level, and no additional tax is imposed merely because those profits are later transferred offshore.

This approach reflects a policy preference for taxing economic activity at source while avoiding layered taxation on capital movement. Once corporate income tax obligations have been met and finalized, Vietnam does not levy a further charge on the remittance itself.

Which foreign entities fall within the branch regime

Foreign enterprises carrying on business in Vietnam through a branch or permanent establishment fall within the branch taxation regime. These entities are treated as extensions of the foreign head office rather than as separate legal persons. As a result, profits are attributed directly to the foreign enterprise through its Vietnamese presence.

Find Business Support

For guidance on profit repatriation planning and branch structuring in Vietnam, contact Dezan Shira & Associates.

Locally incorporated subsidiaries are excluded from this regime and are instead governed by dividend distribution rules. The legal form of presence determines the applicable tax and repatriation framework from the outset.

How branch profits are taxed in Vietnam

Branch profits are subject to Vietnam’s corporate income tax on Vietnam-source net income. The standard corporate income tax rate is 20 percent. This rate applies after allowable deductions, meaning tax is levied on taxable profit rather than gross revenue.

Vietnam provides preferential corporate income tax treatment for qualifying investments, including reduced rates or tax holidays for projects in priority sectors such as high-technology, renewable energy, education, healthcare, and certain manufacturing activities. These incentives affect the effective tax burden on branch profits but do not change how or when profits may be remitted.

For example, a branch generating taxable income of VND 100 billion (US$3.8 million) would incur corporate income tax of VND 20 billion (US$760,000) at the standard 20 percent rate. The remaining VND 80 billion (US$3.04 million) represents after-tax profit that may be remitted to the foreign head office once tax finalization is completed, without any additional remittance-level tax.

The relationship between tax finalization and profit remittance

In Vietnam, profit remittance from a branch is procedurally linked to corporate income tax finalization rather than to a separate remittance tax event. Before profits may be transferred offshore, the branch must complete annual tax finalization supported by audited financial statements. This process reconciles provisional tax payments with final taxable profit and confirms that all corporate income tax liabilities have been fully settled.

In practice, this framework means that branches typically remit profits on an annual basis following tax finalization. Commercial banks require confirmation of completed tax obligations before approving outward remittances of retained earnings.

The constraint on remittance is therefore administrative and timing-based, not fiscal.

Absence of a separate remittance tax and its implications

Because Vietnam does not impose a standalone branch profit remittance tax, no additional withholding tax applies at the point profits are transferred to the foreign head office. Once corporate income tax has been finalized, profits may be remitted without further tax leakage. This distinguishes Vietnam from jurisdictions that impose a post-tax charge on branch remittances and provides greater predictability for foreign investors managing cross-border cash flows.

Treaty considerations in Vietnam’s branch framework

Vietnam’s double tax agreements do not generally operate to reduce branch profit remittance tax because no such tax exists under domestic law. Instead, treaties play a role in defining permanent establishment status, allocating taxing rights over business profits, and preventing double taxation where profits may also be subject to tax in the head office jurisdiction.

Treaty relevance for branches, therefore, lies upstream at the level of profit attribution, rather than at the remittance stage.

Branches and subsidiaries compared on repatriation outcomes

From a tax perspective, Vietnam is largely neutral between branches and subsidiaries for corporate investors. Both structures are subject to corporate income tax at the same statutory rate before profits may be distributed. The distinction arises in the mechanism of repatriation rather than in the overall tax burden.

Find Business Support

Dezan Shira & Associates advises foreign investors on branch taxation, profit remittance, and entity structuring across Vietnam and ASEAN

Branches remit profits after tax finalization without additional withholding. Subsidiaries distribute profits through dividends. Dividends paid by Vietnamese companies to corporate shareholders are subject to 0 percent withholding tax, while dividends paid to individual shareholders are subject to a 5 percent rate. As a result, for corporate groups, both structures typically produce comparable post-tax outcomes. Structural choice is therefore driven more by liability exposure, governance, licensing, and operational considerations than by remittance taxation.

Why branch profit transfers remain a review focus

Although no remittance tax applies, profit transfers from branches remain an area of focus during tax inspections.

Authorities examine whether profits were correctly attributed to Vietnam, whether head office charges were properly supported, and whether remittance occurred only after-tax finalization. Exposure arises not from the act of remittance itself, but from weaknesses in profit determination and documentation that affect corporate income tax.

Execution risks that create avoidable exposure

Foreign investors sometimes underestimate compliance discipline in a no-remittance-tax environment. Informal profit extraction, premature transfers before tax finalization, or unsupported head office allocations can all trigger reassessments. These risks stem from execution failures rather than from the structure of Vietnam’s tax system and are fully avoidable with disciplined reporting and documentation.

When a branch structure becomes less suitable

As operations expand and profitability stabilizes, the limitations of a branch structure may become more pronounced. Increased regulatory interaction, broader commercial activity, or heightened liability considerations may outweigh the administrative simplicity of a branch.

At that stage, conversion to a subsidiary is typically driven by governance and risk-management objectives rather than by remittance tax efficiency.

Managing profit repatriation from Vietnam with certainty

Vietnam’s treatment of branch profits is straightforward once properly understood. There is no separate branch profit remittance tax; only corporate income tax is followed by procedural clearance. Foreign investors who structure operations carefully, attribute profits correctly, and align remittance timing with tax finalization can repatriate profits with certainty and minimal friction.

• Previous Article Evaluating Indonesia’s Middle-Class Growth Using Business Intelligence
• Next Article Enforcing Commercial Contracts in the Philippines: An Investor Enforcement Perspective