Foreign Ownership Restrictions and Conditional Sectors in Vietnam

For foreign investors evaluating Vietnam, market entry is rarely constrained by whether investment is permitted. The decisive issue is how foreign ownership rules shape control, scalability, and exit flexibility. Vietnam does not apply a single ownership regime. Access depends on sector classification, applicable treaty commitments, and licensing conditions that determine how ownership can be exercised in practice.

Related Reading

LLC or JSC? Deciding the Best Upgrade from a Vietnam RO

Importantly, foreign ownership eligibility is not assessed only at incorporation. Authorities reassess ownership alignment during licensing amendments, capital changes, and share transfers. Structures that appear viable at entry can become constrained as operations evolve, making ownership feasibility part of the initial decision between a wholly foreign-owned entity, a partnered structure, or a phased entry model.

How conditional sectors determine commercial viability

Many sectors in Vietnam are open to foreign investment but are designated as conditional. In these sectors, investment is permitted only within defined parameters that directly affect commercial outcomes. Ownership percentages and permitted business activities are legally fixed once the applicable regime is identified, while capital adequacy and experience requirements are often assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Find Business Support

Dezan Shira & Associates advises foreign investors on ownership feasibility and entry structuring in Vietnam. Contact our Vietnam team to discuss your investment plans

Foreign ownership may be capped, commonly at levels such as 49 percent or 51 percent, or permitted at 100 percent only for narrowly defined sub-activities. Alongside these fixed constraints, regulators assess whether registered capital and investor capability align with the scale and risk profile of the licensed activities. A structure can therefore comply on paper while remaining commercially constrained in practice.

When Vietnamese partner participation is unavoidable

In some sectors, foreign investors can enter only through structures that include a Vietnamese shareholder, particularly in areas such as distribution and retail, logistics services, advertising, education, and certain transport- and media-related activities. Where foreign ownership caps apply, they are legally fixed and often require the inclusion of a Vietnamese shareholder, shaping governance rights, economic participation, and exit mechanics from the outset.

In these sectors, regulators assess not only the presence of a local partner, but whether local participation is substantive rather than nominal. Partner participation affects governance arrangements, operating authority, and transfer mechanics. Governance rights, profit distribution, and exit execution are shaped by the ownership structure established at entry.

Choosing a Vietnamese partner shapes how the business operates, scales, and exits from the outset.

Operational and licensing constraints that limit scalability

In several conditional sectors, limits go beyond who owns the company. Licenses are issued for specific activities and operating models, and revenue earned outside that approved scope can trigger compliance issues or a fresh review of the ownership structure, even if shareholding percentages have not changed.

Ownership only works in practice if the licensing conditions can be met and sustained. In some regulated sectors, the law sets a clear minimum capital requirement that must be met for approval. In others, regulators assess whether the proposed capital makes sense for the size and risk of the business rather than applying a fixed number.

The capital figures mentioned here are hypothetical examples based on common licensing practice, meant to help investors judge feasibility at an early stage rather than to signal guaranteed outcomes. In practice, trading and distribution businesses often face capital expectations of around US$100,000 to US$300,000, depending on how wide the operation is and where it will operate. In more tightly regulated service sectors such as logistics, education, or transport-related activities, expected capital levels often move into the high six-figure or low seven-figure US dollar range, even when no formal minimum is written into law.

Experience requirements are usually not expressed as a specific number of years, but they are closely reviewed. If an investor’s track record does not clearly support the licensed activities, approvals can be delayed or refused.

Taken together, these licensing realities define the practical limits within which treaty-based ownership rights can be used.

Treaty-based ownership access and its boundaries

International treaties can expand foreign ownership access in specific sectors, but treaty benefits depend on investor nationality, sector coverage, and correct reliance during licensing. The most common investor error is assuming that treaty commitments override licensing conditions or commercial sufficiency tests.

In practice, treaties may remove or relax ownership caps, but they do not displace capital adequacy requirements, scope restrictions, or regulator discretion over operational feasibility. Investors relying on treaty-based entry must therefore assess whether treaty commitments materially alter ownership outcomes or simply coexist with domestic constraints.

Structuring decisions under ownership constraints

Foreign ownership rules shape structuring decisions from the outset. Wholly foreign-owned entities, partnered structures, and phased investment models each carry different implications for control, governance, and future capital changes.

The structure selected at entry influences operational flexibility over the life of the investment.

Ownership constraints in transactions and exits

Foreign ownership limits apply equally to share transfers, acquisitions, and capital increases. Transactions that breach ownership thresholds are not approved, regardless of commercial rationale.

Ownership restrictions affect transaction timing, buyer eligibility, and execution certainty during exits and fundraising.

Ongoing ownership risk after establishment

Ownership compliance continues after establishment. Changes in activities, shareholders, or revenue composition can trigger reassessment.

Find Business Support

Contact Dezan Shira & Associates for guidance on foreign ownership and market entry in Vietnam

For investors pursuing expansion, ownership monitoring becomes part of governance rather than a one-time compliance task.

Choosing an ownership path before capital is committed

Before committing capital, foreign investors must determine whether the target sector permits the intended ownership level, whether fixed caps or scope restrictions affect control or economics, whether discretionary capital and experience thresholds can realistically be met, and whether future expansion or exit remains feasible under the same structure.

These factors determine whether an entry structure remains workable over time.

Reducing ownership risk through early structuring

Foreign ownership restrictions in Vietnam are most effectively managed before incorporation. Early clarity on sector classification, ownership limits, and conditional requirements allows investors to commit capital with fewer structural constraints later.

• Previous Article 运用商业智能评估印度尼西亚中产阶级的增长潜力
• Next Article Singapore Ranks Fourth in the Asia Manufacturing Index